This is a transcript of a speech given at Hackney Pride by Jamrat Mason, one paragraph was not in the original speech for reasons of time, it has been included below in italics.

My name is Jamrat Mason and I have a vagina.  I'm involved in East London  Community Activism but today I'm here to speak “as a trans person” about transgender issues.  The term “transgender” is a broad term that refers to to a massive spectrum of people who in some way veer away from the gender written on their birth certificate.  So, I cannot, in any way whatsoever, be representative of transgendered people.  I can only talk about the world as I see it, from where I'm standing, as a transexual.

I'm a lucky tranny.  First of all because I'm alive.  And secondly because I have a family who loves me.  That shouldn't be lucky, but at the moment, it is.  My own experience is quite unique so I thought I’d give you a quick history:  At 3 years old my first sentence was “I'm a boy”, at 7 years old when I was still convinced that this was true, my parents took me to a psychologist.  The psychologist said I probably have “Gender Dysphoria”.  My parents talked to my school and allowed me to cut my hair and wear a boy's uniform.  When I was 8   I was referred on to a specialist in London (on the NHS) who I saw until I was 18.  When I was 12 I legally changed my name which my granny paid for.  So I've been living as male since I was about 7 or 8.  I went through a full female puberty and eventually got testosterone when I was 21.  I had surgery when I was 22.  I'm 24 now so I've looked like this for about 2 years.

It’s not my intention to simple ask for a complacent acceptance of trans people- for people to just stop insulting us and beating us up...  I want to talk about transphobia as an issue that affects all of us- and that we can all play a part in fighting.  We must, as a society, be better at gender.

In the womb we all start off as female.  People who come out as little boys are changed during the pregnancy when testosterone is introduced.  The clitoris grows and becomes penis, and the labia becomes a scrotum.  Woman are so-called because they're meant to be like men, but with wombs- womb-man.  But in reality, men are women with big clitorises.  Bigclits.  Most people come out with either a vagina or a penis, but some people are somewhere inbetween- these people are 'intersex'.  As soon as we're born boys and girls are treated drasticallly differently- boys are given lego, girls are given dolls (and then people wonder about the lack of female engineers); girls are encouraged to care and talk about their feelings, whilst boys are told to be tough.  Every boy and girl, to some extent, has to grapple with the difference between who they are, and what a Real Man is.  What a Real Woman is.  Every body suffers from the invention of the Man and the Woman.  And I consider myself an extreme casualty of this- I don't really consider myself a Man- but I know, violently, that I'm not a woman.  I think that transpeople generally are an extreme casualty of this problem.

Society is organised into men and women and I don't fit into either.  If I were to have to go to prison, I could either be a man in an all female prison, or a man with a vagina in an all male-prison where privacy is not exactly a priority.  If I were to be arrested and strip-searched I've got a choice between a male officer or a female police officer.  But I'm not a man, that is not my sex, I am a transexual.  There is now a Gender Recognition Certificate so that I can be recognised as either a Man or a Woman by the state.  But I am not a Man or a Woman, I am a transexual.  I could be treated as a man, go to a male prison, be searched by a male officer, get married to a woman.  But I don't want to get married, I don't want to live in a society where people are sent to prison and strip searched by police.  I don't believe in leading a fight where we're asking the government to deal with us more efficiently, to oppress us better.  I don't want to be integrated better a rotten system, I want something different altogether.  I want to take part in creating a better world.

Prejudice against transmen, that's me, is based on the sense that we're trying to muscle in on the privilege of being male that we don't deserve, we are inadequate, we don't have penises, and if we do, they're either weird and tiny or crap.  We're inadequate men, with big bums and crap willies.

Prejudice against transwomen is based on the sense that they're degrading themselves, they're funny, a joke, why would you want to be a woman? They're trying to take a step down in society.

So transphobia is rooted in sexism.  Some people believe that transwomen can't possibly know what it's like to be a woman because they haven't experienced sexism.  But the transphobia that transwoman get IS sexism, multiplied by a hundred!

Some people say that trans men are just trying to escape sexism by turning into men.  Let me tell you, when you're a transexual, you do not escape sexism, you are pushed right into an enormous swamp of sexism.  When you experience both sides and more, you begin to see the sexism, you notice it when other people don't, when you play with gender you're witnessing the flow of power.

Sexism, and more specifically this form of sexism which is a reaction to people’s gender deviance- not being a Proper Man, or a Proper Woman, is something that seems to be ignored.  It plays a huge part in homophobia- A gay boy, who is very masculine and handy with his fists is not likely to be bullied at school.  School kids don't usually see what their school mates find sexually attractive, they see how they behave.  Effeminate boys are bullied for being effeminate- and the words the kids use are gay, and batty boy, but they're being bullied because they're not acting like Real Men, this is sexism, but we call it homophobia.  And when you call it homophobia, what organisations are there helping the effeminate straight boy?  He's being told that it's okay to be gay, but no one's saying that it's okay to be a bit girly.  This is the same bullying that transexual people experience in the extreme, but it is in no way reserved for us.

The experience of transgendered people is at the lethally sharp end of the wedge- and it is a lethally sharp edge, the Transgender Day of Remembrance website shows that in 2009 130 transgendered people were reported murdered- but this is a universal problem, rooted in sexism, it affects all os us and we can all take a part in fighting it.

The invention of the Real Man and the Real Woman is enshrined in the economy.  For as long as someone has to work all week to get a wage, to survive, and for as long as we have babies that have to be looked after, someone else has to work in the home, and bring up babies for free.  At the moment, most of the time, the man works full time and the woman works for free in the home.  It's the unpaid labour that keeps the whole system running.  Take it away, and the whole thing collapses.  But that won't change by messing around with gender, or by swapping it around and turning the patriarchy into a matriarchy, or mixing it up, or by taking turns... or by paying another woman minimum wage to do the job instead.  For as long as this system keeps going, someone has to work in the home for free. And this is one of the most fundamental injustices the forms the foundation of our economy.  As much as transgendered people might highlight that these are not two unchanging natural roles, a liberal plea for tolerance is not the force that will bring it down.

I want to come back to this idea that we need to, as a society, as a community, be better at gender.  The transition from one gender role to another is not just about surgery, in fact surgery plays a very small role in it.  For the most part, transition is social, because gender roles are social.  As I mentioned before, I lived for 12 years as male without any surgery or hormones whatsoever.  I now fit into the category of male because people call me ‘he’ and regard me as male.  The fact that transition is social seems to be lost on most people, when someone comes out as trans, people tend to wait until that person is manly, or womanly, enough to convince them.  The onus is put on the trans person to “act like a man” or “act like a woman” just to have their identity respected.  This often means, that for transmen, we are rewarded for acting like macho idiots, for only then will people respect our identity.  It should be everyone’s responsibility to respect someone’s identity, to play a part in the journey to becoming comfortable in their skin.

What is it we want with our Pride Marches and our activism?

The freedom to walk down the street, dressed how you like, kissing who you like, in a couple of expensive areas of central and west London?  What about kissing in Clapton?  Stratford? East Ham?  What about being free in our working class communities where we actually live?  When will we be free to express our love, our gender, our bodies without fear of being beaten up by gangs of teenage boys?  And what about those teenage boys? Our neighbours?  When will that teenage boy feel free to suck off his mate, or wear a dress, without fear of complete rejection or without thinking that that would make him an entirely different person?

It might be tempting, for those middle class homosexuals who have achieved their freedom, who are happily walking hand in hand down their little street in Hampstead, to pull the ladder up behind them and not be associated with transgenders, with us deviants, or with us working class queers in areas like Hackney, who still live surrounded by homophobia, transphobia, sexism.  I think we can see that temptation when we look at what London Pride has become.  And that’s why it’s important to have events like this, to keep our grassroots activism, and not accept anything less than absolute and complete freedom. 

On Sat the 3rd Leeds Anarchist Federation called a meeting for an Antifascist Coalition in Leeds with the intention of discussing the EDL and ideas for how to respond to their plans to march in Bradford in August. The people attending the meeting were aware of the EDL's intention to attack the meeting but decided to go ahead with it anyway. Preparations were made for this possibility with the intention to try to de-escalate first, as a fight in the Swarthmore Center was in no way what we wanted, and we were prepared for other eventualities should a de-escalation fail. However, this predicted attack never materialised.

What did happen was that 5 unknown people arrived. The door was locked and so they rang the buzzer and waited. They claimed to be antifascists wanting to go to the antifascist meeting. When they came in one of them told us they were antifascists from Wakefield and asked us what we were going to do about the EDL. Two of them stood nervously in the doorway and the others sat down, one of them went and sat quietly at the other end of the room from his friends. We asked why they wanted to confront the EDL and they said because some of them are racist. We tried to question them further about this but it seemed that the guy doing most of the talking didn't feel he was doing a very convincing job. He said "You know who we are, don't you?", so we asked who and he said they were the EDL. At this point, a number of people in the meeting stood up and positioned themselves more conveniently, so this man started insisting they didn't want a fight and they were just here to explain that they weren't racist. He insisted repeatedly that he was just here to talk and made numerous defensive bids for acceptance ("don't tar us all with the same brush", etc). They seemed to be more concerned about PR than anything else but the brief exchange we had with him was predictably ridiculous and it wasn't the time or the place to discuss what he wanted so we asked them to leave and after a few repetitions of "But just let me finish...", they did.

Despite being less of an attack and at most a mild inconvenience, it is in the interest of this man, called Snowy, to exaggerate this incident and his role in it as much as possible. Since the rooftop protests in Dudley he's been trying to rise higher in the ranks of the EDL and is obviously hoping that he and his faction will gain more credibility if he makes it in and out of an antifascist meeting unscathed (no matter how this was accomplished). Snowy's political ambitions are pretty transparent and his attempts to make his strange behaviour look impressive are equally transparent.

The politics of the EDL feed into an agenda that poses a threat to the unity of the working class and has to be confronted. All over the world the bosses and politicians are using the recession to attack the working class using the nationalist rhetoric that "we're all in this together", while the EDL serve to focus concerns away from these attacks onto immigrants and foreign culture, simultaneously encouraging the white working class to identify with the white ruling class in an act of pseudo-rebellion that only serves to undermine their own interests. Although the EDL is not a fascist organisation, their presence on the streets of Bradford will only serve to strengthen the division of the working class according to tribalist principles of ethnicity and culture. Having said this, testosterone laden politics that responds with merely street violence fails to adequately address the situation. Our response has to be in accordance with our political aims.

Anarchist Federation Leeds

Parents in Glasgow occupied yet another primary school this week; the latest in a series of school occupations which have taken place over the past year. Taking action in response to proposals to close St. Matthew's Primary School, five concerned parents barricaded themselves inside the school and announced their intention to remain there until their demands were met. Protests have also taken place at three other schools in the area set to close. These threatened closures are the most recent in a concerted campaign by councils across Greater Glasgow to shut of schools and nurseries.

Read more: Parents occupy school in Lanarkshire threatened with closure

The British National Party has been getting a lot of attention lately, from politicians, the media, and most importantly from sizeable sections of the working-class who feel that the BNP represent their interests. Housing, work, pay and welfare are all issues which the BNP have supposedly taken up whilst claiming to represent the “British working-class”. The BNP however is stooped in a tradition of fighting against our class, from collaborating with rich business owners to calling for the ending of, and actively working against workers' struggles, such as strikes. Despite this, the BNP are still attempting to tap into the working class, especially in former pit towns and dilapidated industrial zones as a way to increase their support by blaming the problems which the bosses (represented by the past and current Tory and Labour governments) have created, on asylum seekers, migrant workers, women and LGBT people, in other words, blaming other working class people for problems they have not created and are also suffering from themselves.

Read more: The BNP, a working class party?

Parents have reoccupied Wyndford Primary School and physically prevented the council removing equipment and furniture in a bid to keep a primary school in their community.

Read more: Glasgow School Occupied in Defiance of Council Cuts